Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
DeRolph v. State is a landmark case in Ohio constitutional law in which the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled that the state's method for funding public education was unconstitutional. [1] On March 24, 1997, the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled in a 4–3 decision that the state funding system "fails to provide for a thorough and efficient system of ...
During the prosecution of this case, Valve implemented a refund policy for Steam purchases, but the case still reviewed Valve's actions prior to the onset of the lawsuit. The court overseeing the case sided with the ACCC in assigning a A$ 3 million (about US$2.1 million ) fine against Valve in December 2016, as well as requiring Valve to inform ...
On March 17, 2009, the IRS issued new rules for Madoff investors who claim theft losses. Revenue Ruling 2009–9, [110] sets forth general rules for claiming theft losses from Ponzi schemes, and Revenue Procedure 2009–20, [111] includes safe harbor elections for investors in such schemes.
Click on the purchase that you wish to refund, then click the “I would like a refund” button. From here, you can choose to get help with gameplay or technical issues, or simply request a refund.
Ohioans aren't eligible for a tax refund for time they spent working at home during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled Wednesday.
Three companies will pay $110 million to the state of Ohio to settle a lawsuit charging them with dumping "forever" chemicals in the Ohio River. State nets $110 million from lawsuit over 'forever ...
Taxation in the United States. Tax protester arguments are arguments made by people, primarily in the United States, who contend that tax laws are unconstitutional or otherwise invalid. Tax protester arguments are typically based on an asserted belief that their government is acting outside of its legal authority when imposing such taxes.
The Sixteenth Amendment in the National Archives. The Sixteenth Amendment ( Amendment XVI) to the United States Constitution allows Congress to levy an income tax without apportioning it among the states on the basis of population. It was passed by Congress in 1909 in response to the 1895 Supreme Court case of Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.