Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol ( HTCPCP) is a facetious communication protocol for controlling, monitoring, and diagnosing coffee pots. It is specified in RFC 2324, published on 1 April 1998 as an April Fools' Day RFC, [ 2] as part of an April Fools prank. [ 3] An extension, HTCPCP-TEA, was published as RFC 7168 on 1 April 2014 [ 4 ...
As the HTTP/1.0 standard did not define any 1xx status codes, servers must not [note 1] send a 1xx response to an HTTP/1.0 compliant client except under experimental conditions. 100 Continue The server has received the request headers and the client should proceed to send the request body (in the case of a request for which a body needs to be ...
X.3.XXX Mail System Status. X.4.XXX Network and Routing Status. X.5.XXX Mail Delivery Protocol Status. X.6.XXX Message Content or Media Status. X.7.XXX Security or Policy Status. The meaning of the "detail" field depends on the class and the subject, and are listed in RFC 3463 and RFC 5248 . A server capable of replying with an Enhanced Status ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Pages for logged out editors learn more
Accessing AOL Mail account simultaneously from 2 different browsers. Accessing AOL Mail on multiple devices simultaneously from more than one place. Possible fixes
In this code, 5 physical qubits are used to encode the logical qubit. [2] With X {\displaystyle X} and Z {\displaystyle Z} being Pauli matrices and I {\displaystyle I} the Identity matrix , this code's generators are X Z Z X I , I X Z Z X , X I X Z Z , Z X I X Z {\displaystyle \langle XZZXI,IXZZX,XIXZZ,ZXIXZ\rangle } .
Type I and type II errors. In statistical hypothesis testing, a type I error, or a false positive, is the rejection of the null hypothesis when it is actually true. For example, an innocent person may be convicted. A type II error, or a false negative, is the failure to reject a null hypothesis that is actually false.
A low code-rate close to zero implies a strong code that uses many redundant bits to achieve a good performance, while a large code-rate close to 1 implies a weak code. The redundant bits that protect the information have to be transferred using the same communication resources that they are trying to protect.