Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The RFC specifies this code should be returned by teapots requested to brew coffee. [18] This HTTP status is used as an Easter egg in some websites, such as Google.com's "I'm a teapot" easter egg. [19] [20] [21] Sometimes, this status code is also used as a response to a blocked request, instead of the more appropriate 403 Forbidden. [22] [23]
Locally decodable codes are error-correcting codes for which single bits of the message can be probabilistically recovered by only looking at a small (say constant) number of positions of a codeword, even after the codeword has been corrupted at some constant fraction of positions.
1xx—Provisional Responses. 100 Trying. Extended search being performed may take a significant time so a forking proxy must send a 100 Trying response. [ 1]: §21.1.1. 180 Ringing. Destination user agent received INVITE, and is alerting user of call. [ 1]: §21.1.2. 181 Call is Being Forwarded.
The Reed–Solomon code is actually a family of codes, where every code is characterised by three parameters: an alphabet size , a block length, and a message length, with <. The set of alphabet symbols is interpreted as the finite field F {\displaystyle F} of order q {\displaystyle q} , and thus, q {\displaystyle q} must be a prime power .
Cyclic redundancy check. A cyclic redundancy check ( CRC) is an error-detecting code commonly used in digital networks and storage devices to detect accidental changes to digital data. [ 1][ 2] Blocks of data entering these systems get a short check value attached, based on the remainder of a polynomial division of their contents.
A simple code for service dispatches relating to corrections, repetitions, etc. A standard arrangement of the context of messages, (for example, name and description of missing person might be transmitted as follows: Name, age, height, weight, physical characteristics, clothing; if car used, the license, make, description and motor number.
Type I and type II errors. In statistical hypothesis testing, a type I error, or a false positive, is the rejection of the null hypothesis when it is actually true. For example, an innocent person may be convicted. A type II error, or a false negative, is the failure to reject a null hypothesis that is actually false.
X.3.XXX Mail System Status. X.4.XXX Network and Routing Status. X.5.XXX Mail Delivery Protocol Status. X.6.XXX Message Content or Media Status. X.7.XXX Security or Policy Status. The meaning of the "detail" field depends on the class and the subject, and are listed in RFC 3463 and RFC 5248 . A server capable of replying with an Enhanced Status ...