City Pedia Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Peel v. Attorney Disciplinary Commission of Illinois, 496 US 91 (1990), [1] was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that Illinois' rule against attorneys advertising themselves as "certified" violated their freedom of speech under the First Amendment. The Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (IARDC) had ...

  3. Warren Ballentine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Ballentine

    Ballentine was born and raised on Chicago 's South Side, where he attended and graduated from Lindblom High School in 1992. He is an alumnus of Chicago State University in Chicago, Illinois, and graduated from law school at Ohio Northern University Pettit College of Law in Ada, Ohio. Ballentine joined the Iota Nu Sigma Alumni chapter of Phi ...

  4. Judge faces inquiry after Illinois attorney was kicked ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/judge-faces-inquiry-illinois...

    June 12, 2024 at 7:30 AM. CHICAGO (AP) — Cook County's top judge has asked state regulators to review allegations that an attorney was handcuffed to a chair after a judge kicked him out of her ...

  5. In re Himmel - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_re_Himmel

    The client asked Himmel not to report the first lawyer's misconduct to the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (IARDC) because she feared that it would hinder the recovery efforts. Over the course of 24 months, Himmel brokered an agreement where the first attorney promised to pay $75,000 if the client agreed not to prosecute.

  6. Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Board

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_v...

    Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 351 U.S. 115 (1956) and 367 U.S. 1 (1961), was a federal court case in the United States involving the compelled registration of the Communist Party of the United States, under a statute requiring that all organizations determined to be directed or controlled by the "world Communist movement" publicly disclose ...

  7. Watkins v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watkins_v._United_States

    Watkins v. United States, 354 U.S. 178 (1957), is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that held that the power of the United States Congress is not unlimited in conducting investigations and that nothing in the United States Constitution gives it the authority to expose the private affairs of individuals.

  8. Judiciary of Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judiciary_of_Illinois

    The Supreme Court administers professional discipline through the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC), and they govern initial licensing through the Illinois Board of Admissions to the Bar, where the applicant must receive a certification of good moral character and general fitness to practice law by the Illinois ...

  9. Scales v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scales_v._United_States

    Holding; The Internal Security Act of 1950, which provides, in part, that neither "the holding of office nor membership in any Communist organization by any person shall constitute per se a violation" of that or any other criminal statute, did not repeal pro tanto the membership clause of the Smith Act by excluding from the reach of that clause membership in any Communist organization