Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Ripoff Report is a private for-profit website founded by Ed Magedson. [1] The Ripoff Report has been online since December 1998 and is operated by Xcentric Ventures, LLC which is based in Tempe, Arizona. [2] In 2023 an Australian judge found the company purports to be a consumer review site but profits from extortive business practices. [3]
The Signpost has identified an extensive scam perpetrated by a company that calls itself " Elite Wiki Writers " or " Wiki Moderator ", among many other names. Some of the other names they are suspected of using include wikicuratorz.com, wikiscribes.com, wikimastery.com, and wikimediafoundetion.com. Annie Rauwerda described the general situation ...
Ripoff. A ripoff (or rip-off) is an grossly unfavorable financial transaction. It originated as slang that has entered into standard English usage as a business term. [1] Usually it refers to an incident in which a person is overcharged for something, or receives goods or services not of the standard expected for the price. A ripoff is usually ...
Ripoff Report should not be a legal source for this article First of all, Ripoff Report used to claim that "you can write whatever you want because we are protected by the First Amendment": false. Then the narration became "We cannot and will not dissolve the First Amendment rights of our users based on a unilateral allegation that something in ...
Technical support scams rely on social engineering to persuade victims that their device is infected with malware. [15] [16] Scammers use a variety of confidence tricks to persuade the victim to install remote desktop software, with which the scammer can then take control of the victim's computer.
11 Fair use rationale for Image:Ripoffreport.com screenshot.png. 1 comment. 12 ...
Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) is an American website founded in 2015 by Dave M. Van Zandt. [ 1 ] It considers four main categories and multiple subcategories in assessing the "political bias" and "factual reporting" of media outlets, [ 2 ][ 3 ] relying on a self-described "combination of objective measures and subjective analysis". [ 4 ][ 5 ]
The nature of Wikipedia controversies has been analyzed by scholars. Sociologist Howard Rheingold says that "Wikipedia controversies have revealed the evolution of social mechanisms in the Wikipedia community"; [10] a study of the politicization of socio-technical spaces remarked that Wikipedia "controversies ... become fully-fledged when they are advertised outside the page being debated ...