City Pedia Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/...

    These sites frequently republish content from Gale's encyclopedias; many editors can obtain access to Gale through The Wikipedia Library free of charge. Advameg's sites are on the Wikipedia spam blacklist, and links must be whitelisted before they can be used. WP:COPYLINK prohibits linking to copyright violations. 1 2 +43: The Age 2021: 2021

  3. Wikipedia:Peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review

    Wikipedia's peer review process is a feature where an editor can receive feedback from others on how to improve an article they are working on, or receive advice about a specific issue queried by the editor. The process helps users find ways for improvement that they themselves didn't pick up on. Compared to the real-world peer review process ...

  4. Review site - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Review_site

    Rating site. A rating site (commonly known as a rate-me site) is a website designed for users to vote, rate people, content, or other things. Rating sites can range from tangible to non-tangible attributes, but most commonly, rating sites are based around physical appearances such as body parts, voice, personality, etc.

  5. Wikipedia Review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Review

    Wikipedia Review is an Internet forum and blog for the discussion of Wikimedia Foundation projects, in particular the content and conflicts of Wikipedia. [3] [4] Wikipedia Review sought to act as a watchdog website, scrutinizing Wikipedia and reporting on its flaws. [5] It provides an independent forum to discuss Wikipedia editors and their ...

  6. Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reviewing_good...

    How to review a Good article nomination. First things to look for. Assessing the article and providing a review. Mistakes to avoid in reviews. Giving problems, not solutions. Imposing your personal criteria. Passing articles that do not meet the Good article criteria. Dealing with disputes. Get a second opinion.

  7. Wikipedia:Featured articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_articles

    Featured articles are considered to be some of the best articles Wikipedia has to offer, as determined by Wikipedia's editors. They are used by editors as examples for writing other articles. Before being listed here, articles are reviewed as featured article candidates for accuracy, neutrality, completeness, and style according to our featured ...

  8. Wikipedia:Good articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_articles

    Good articles in Wikipedia. A good article (GA) is a Wikipedia article that meets a core set of editorial standards, the good article criteria, passing through the good article nomination process successfully. They are well-written, contain factually accurate and verifiable information, are broad in coverage, neutral in point of view, stable ...

  9. Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (science) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    Articles published in respected peer-reviewed scientific journals are preferred for up-to-date reliable information. Scientific literature contains two major types of sources: primary publications that describe novel research for the first time, and review articles that summarize and integrate a topic of research into an overall view.