City Pedia Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of fake news websites - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fake_news_websites

    The man behind one of America's biggest 'fake news' websites is a former BBC worker from London whose mother writes many of his stories. Sean Adl-Tabatabai, 35, runs YourNewsWire.com, the source of scores of dubious news stories, including claims that the Queen had threatened to abdicate if the UK voted against Brexit.

  3. Review site - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Review_site

    Rating site. A rating site (commonly known as a rate-me site) is a website designed for users to vote, rate people, content, or other things. Rating sites can range from tangible to non-tangible attributes, but most commonly, rating sites are based around physical appearances such as body parts, voice, personality, etc.

  4. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/...

    The following presents a non-exhaustive list of sources whose reliability and use on Wikipedia are frequently discussed. This list summarizes prior consensus and consolidates links to the most in-depth and recent discussions from the reliable sources noticeboard and elsewhere on Wikipedia.

  5. Wikipedia:Peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review

    Wikipedia's peer review process is a feature where an editor can receive feedback from others on how to improve an article they are working on, or receive advice about a specific issue queried by the editor. The process helps users find ways for improvement that they themselves didn't pick up on. Compared to the real-world peer review process ...

  6. Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reviewing_good...

    How to review a Good article nomination. First things to look for. Assessing the article and providing a review. Mistakes to avoid in reviews. Giving problems, not solutions. Imposing your personal criteria. Passing articles that do not meet the Good article criteria. Dealing with disputes. Get a second opinion.

  7. Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia

    A 2006 review of Wikipedia by Library Journal, using a panel of librarians, "the toughest critics of reference materials, whatever their format", asked "long standing reviewers" to evaluate three areas of Wikipedia (popular culture, current affairs, and science), and concluded: "While there are still reasons to proceed with caution when using a ...

  8. Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    Wikipedia. : Identifying reliable sources (medicine) This page documents an English Wikipedia content guideline. This page in a nutshell: Ideal sources for biomedical material include literature reviews or systematic reviews in reliable, third-party, published secondary sources (such as reputable medical journals ), recognised standard ...

  9. Review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Review

    A book review (or book report) is a form of criticism in which a book is analyzed based on content, style, and merit. It is often carried out in periodicals, as school work, or online. Its length may vary from a single paragraph to a substantial essay. In the case of a work of poetry or fiction, or of nonfiction in which the literary merits of ...