Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
U.S. v. AT&T (1982) United States of America v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., et al. The Sherman Antitrust Act enabled the United States government to break up the AT&T telephone monopoly into seven smaller companies. United States v. AT&T, 552 F.Supp. 131 (1982), was a ruling of the United States District Court for the District of ...
The breakup of the Bell System resulted in the creation of seven independent companies that were formed from the original twenty-two AT&T-controlled members of the System. [5] On January 1, 1984, these companies were NYNEX, Pacific Telesis, Ameritech, Bell Atlantic, Southwestern Bell Corporation, BellSouth, and US West. NYNEX, merged with Bell ...
AT&T Corporation v. Hulteen , 556 U.S. 701 (2009), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court , holding that maternity leave taken before the passage of the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act needed not to be considered in calculating employee pension benefits.
Facebook recently paid 1.4 million Illinois residents $397 in 2022 as part of a class action lawsuit for facial recognition breaches through its “Tag Suggestions” feature, per CNBC. Google is ...
United States v. AT&T. United States v. AT&T may refer to several court cases: United States v. AT&T (1982), a lawsuit enforcing the divestiture of the Bell System. United States v. AT&T (2019), a lawsuit attempting to block a merger with Time Warner.
USA Today - Pension Funds Fall Short of Guarantees - January 16, 2006; Pittsburgh Tribune – Review - Verizon Retirees Seek Say on Pay - May 3, 2007; New York Times - Verizon Vote On Pay Levels To Be Decided In a Recount –May 4, 2007; New York Times – Say On Pay Gets Support at Verizon – May 19, 2007
Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost filed a lawsuit to remove two board members of the State ... The state's second largest public pension fund oversees about $90 billion invested on behalf of 500,000 ...
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), is a legal dispute that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. On April 27, 2011, the Court ruled, by a 5–4 margin, that the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 preempts state laws that prohibit contracts from disallowing class-wide arbitration, such as the law previously upheld by the California Supreme Court in the case of Discover ...