City Pedia Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Reed v. Reed - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reed_v._Reed

    Reed v. Reed was the first major Supreme Court case that addressed that discrimination based on gender was unconstitutional because it denies equal protection. The director for the ACLU, Mel Wulf, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote Sally Reed's brief.

  3. When a man argues against two beautiful ladies like this ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/When_a_man_argues_against...

    Floyd's joke and the ensuing silence. On December 13, 1971, during oral arguments before the United States Supreme Court in the abortion rights case Roe v. Wade, Texas assistant attorney general Jay Floyd prefaced his remarks with a reference to his opposing counsel, Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee: "It's an old joke, but when a man argues against two beautiful ladies like this, they are ...

  4. Brown v. Board of Education - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Board_of_Education

    Kentucky (1908) Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), [1] was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that U.S. state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality. The decision partially overruled the Court's 1896 ...

  5. Reed v. Town of Gilbert - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reed_v._Town_of_Gilbert

    I, Gilbert, Ariz., Land Development Code (Sign Code or Code), ch. 1, ยง4.402 (2005) Reed v. Town of Gilbert, 576 U.S. 155 (2015), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court clarified when municipalities may impose content-based restrictions on signage. The case also clarified the level of constitutional scrutiny that should be applied ...

  6. In re Neagle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_re_Neagle

    Field took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. U.S. Const. Art. III, Sec. 788 of the Revised Statutes of the United States. In re Neagle, 135 U.S. 1 (1890), is a United States Supreme Court decision holding that federal officers are immune from State prosecution when acting within the scope of their federal authority.

  7. Arsenal Football Club v Reed - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arsenal_Football_Club_v_Reed

    Consequently, in this particular case, there is a violation of the specific interests of the Arsenal FC by Reed. He used the sign in the meaning of Article 5 (1) of the trade mark directive. Therefore, there is a trade mark infringement by Reed selling products, not official wear by Arsenal FC, but carrying the sign of the Arsenal FC.

  8. Brandeis brief - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandeis_brief

    The Brandeis brief was a pioneering legal brief that was the first in United States legal history to rely more on a compilation of scientific information and social science literature than on legal citations. [1] It is named after then-litigator and eventual associate Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, who presented it in his argument for ...

  9. Federal prosecutors meet with Boeing, crash victims ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/federal-prosecutors-meet...

    Federal prosecutors are meeting with planemaker Boeing and the relatives of victims killed in two 737 Max crashes in 2018 and 2019 ahead of a July 7 deadline for the Justice Department to decide ...