City Pedia Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Space Shuttle program - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_program

    In 2010, the incremental cost per flight of the Space Shuttle was $409 million, or $14,186 per kilogram ($6,435 per pound) to low Earth orbit (LEO). In contrast, the comparable Proton launch vehicle cost was $141 million, or $6,721 per kilogram ($3,049 per pound) to LEO and the Soyuz 2.1 was $55 million, or $6,665 per kilogram ($3,023 per pound ...

  3. Space Shuttle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle

    III−489−490 Development estimates made in 1972 projected a per-pound cost of payload as low as $1,109 (in 2012) per pound, but the actual payload costs, not to include the costs for the research and development of the Space Shuttle, were $37,207 (in 2012) per pound. [20]:

  4. RS-25 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-25

    The RS-25, also known as the Space Shuttle Main Engine ( SSME ), [ 1] is a liquid-fuel cryogenic rocket engine that was used on NASA 's Space Shuttle and is used on the Space Launch System (SLS). Designed and manufactured in the United States by Rocketdyne (later Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne and Aerojet Rocketdyne ), the RS-25 burns cryogenic ...

  5. Thrust-to-weight ratio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrust-to-weight_ratio

    Calculation. The thrust-to-weight ratio is calculated by dividing the thrust (in SI units – in newtons) by the weight (in newtons) of the engine or vehicle. The weight (N) is calculated by multiplying the mass in kilograms (kg) by the acceleration due to gravity (m/s 2 ). The thrust can also be measured in pound-force (lbf), provided the ...

  6. Criticism of the Space Shuttle program - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Space...

    In 2010, the incremental cost per flight of the Space Shuttle was $409 million, or $14,186 per kilogram ($6,435 per pound) to low Earth orbit (LEO). In contrast, the comparable Proton launch vehicle cost was $141 million, or $6,721 per kilogram ($3,049 per pound) to LEO and the Soyuz 2.1 was $55 million, or $6,665 per kilogram ($3,023 per pound ...

  7. Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Booster - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Solid_Rocket...

    242 seconds (2.37 km/s) Burn time. 123 s. Propellant. PBAN - APCP. The Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Booster ( SRB) was the first solid-propellant rocket to be used for primary propulsion on a vehicle used for human spaceflight. [1] A pair of these provided 85% of the Space Shuttle 's thrust at liftoff and for the first two minutes of ascent.

  8. Space Shuttle to reach St. Cloud this weekend - AOL

    www.aol.com/space-shuttle-reach-st-cloud...

    More: Space shuttle looks for landing St. Cloud's future space shuttle is on the move despite financial uncertainty. ... The project cost Pederson and his wife, Irene Pederson, upwards of $1.5 ...

  9. Space Shuttle design process - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_design_process

    The primary intended use of the Phase A Space Shuttle was supporting the future space station, ferrying a minimum crew of four and about 20,000 pounds (9,100 kg) of cargo, and being able to be rapidly turned around for future flights, with larger payloads like space station modules being lifted by the Saturn V. Two designs emerged as front-runners.