City Pedia Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Citizens United v. FEC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC

    McConnell v. FEC (2003) (in part) Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The court held 5–4 that the freedom of speech clause of the First Amendment ...

  3. Buckley v. Valeo - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckley_v._Valeo

    Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on campaign finance. A majority of justices held that, as provided by section 608 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, limits on election expenditures are unconstitutional. In a per curiam (by the Court) opinion, they ruled that expenditure limits ...

  4. Campaign finance reform amendment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_finance_reform...

    Campaign finance reform amendment. A campaign finance reform amendment refers to any proposed amendment to the United States Constitution to authorize greater restrictions on spending related to political speech, and to overturn Supreme Court rulings which have narrowed such laws under the First Amendment. Several amendments have been filed ...

  5. McConnell v. FEC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McConnell_v._FEC

    Overruled by. Citizens United v. FEC (2010) (in part) McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, 540 U.S. 93 (2003), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of most of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), often referred to as the McCain – Feingold Act.

  6. Opinion: When does government speech violate the 1st Amendment?

    www.aol.com/news/opinion-does-government-speech...

    The government encouraging them to remove false speech only violates the 1st Amendment if it can be proved that the government caused, and will cause in the future, speech to be blocked.

  7. McCutcheon v. FEC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCutcheon_v._FEC

    McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, 572 U.S. 185 (2014), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on campaign finance. The decision was partially overruled with respect to aggregate base limits concerning two years election cycles which is located under Title 2 U.S.C. Ch. 14 Sub Ch. 1 Section 441a (a)(3)(B) which concerns aggregate limits on expenditures within; The [[Federal ...

  8. Campaign finance reform in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_finance_reform_in...

    Campaign finance laws in the United States have been a contentious political issue since the early days of the union. The most recent major federal law affecting campaign finance was the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) of 2002, also known as " McCain - Feingold ". Key provisions of the law prohibited unregulated contributions (commonly ...

  9. United States free speech exceptions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech...

    United States free speech exceptions. In the United States, some categories of speech are not protected by the First Amendment. According to the Supreme Court of the United States, the U.S. Constitution protects free speech while allowing limitations on certain categories of speech. [ 1] Categories of speech that are given lesser or no ...